Appeals

City Hall building behind tree on sunny day

City Council can hear appeals of decisions made by certain boards, commissions and other decision makers. The City provides a clear process for filing appeals with specific requirements and procedures.

How to File an Appeal

The Appeal Guidelines explain the process for filing an appeal. You must deliver the Appeal Form to the City Clerk at 300 Laporte Ave. with original signatures and a check or money order for the appeal fee payable to the City of Fort Collins:

  • Notice of Appeal: $250
  • Request for Fair Hearing Review: $100

These documents are provided for printing purposes. For assistance viewing or reading these documents, please contact the City's ADA Coordinator via email adacoordinator@fortcollins.gov or phone: 970-416-4254.

Quasi-Judicial Procedures

The law requires special procedures for quasi-judicial matters, including appeals. Please review the Quasi-Judicial Council Procedures for more information.

Legislative and Quasi-Judicial City Council Proceedings

Certain City Council decisions are legally characterized as “administrative” or “legislative” and others are legally characterized as “quasi-judicial.” (In addition, a number of City boards and commissions such as the Planning and Zoning Board, Zoning Board of Appeals, and Landmark Planning Commission, also make quasi-judicial decisions as part of their responsibilities.)   

The law requires special procedures for quasi-judicial matters. The following information addresses common questions about legislative and quasi-judicial procedures:

  • City Council Administrative and Legislative Matters: City Council typically operates as a policy-making body.
    • In its administrative and legislative capacities, the Council gathers information at public hearings, as well as from informal conversations and correspondence with community members, information prepared by City staff, and other sources.
    • The Council then approves an action or deliberates and implements a Citywide policy by adopting a resolution or ordinance.
    • Examples of Council legislative actions include reviewing and adopting City Plan, the City budget and amendments to the Municipal Code.
    • Ex parte communications (described below) are permitted for legislative matters.
  • City Council Quasi-Judicial Matters: Less frequently, the Council makes decisions regarding "quasi-judicial" matters and in doing so, acts in a manner like a judge in a court of law.
    • In a quasi-judicial proceeding, the Council applies established City Code or Land Use Code standards to facts presented at a public hearing to reach a decision.
    • Examples of quasi-judicial decisions include designating Fort Collins landmarks, appeals to City Council under City Code Chapter 2, Article II, and zonings or rezonings of 640 acres in size or less.
    • Quasi-judicial decisions generally affect the rights of a specific person, or few specific persons, and are not applicable Citywide.
  • Special Rules for Quasi-Judicial Decisions: In making quasi-judicial decisions, the right to due process (a constitutionally fair procedure) and good legal practices generally require that Council follow certain rules, including:
    • The Council must provide advance notice and a reasonable opportunity for interested parties to present evidence and argument at a public hearing.
      • "Interested parties" may be specified, as in the case of an appeal to City Council.
    • The Council must make a record of the proceeding that includes all the information it considers in making its decision.
      • City staff collects all letters, emails and documents submitted before the hearing and includes them in the record of the hearing for Council to consider in making its decision.
      • If the Council decision is appealed, a reviewing court will review whether evidence in the record supports the Council decision.
    • The Council must avoid ex parte contacts and Council should only receive information that is presented at the public hearing and through the record compiled by City staff, described above.
      • Ex parte contacts are communications between a Councilmember and an interested party or member of the public outside of the public hearing where a quasi-judicial matter will be decided.
      • Ex parte contacts can deny due process and be unfair to supporters or opponents of a quasi-judicial matter because the information communicated is not part of the record and one side is not present to hear, consider, and rebut statements being made to such Councilmember.
      • Courts generally regard ex parte contacts with suspicion and such contacts may provide the legal basis for overturning a decision.
      • The prohibition on ex parte communications promotes transparent, impartial decisions by ensuring the disclosure of all evidence and argument presented to the Council for its deliberation and decision.
      • The rule also gives everyone involved in a quasi-judicial proceeding a fair chance to respond to all of the information that may affect Council's decision.
  • Participating in a Quasi-Judicial Decision: While ex parte communications are prohibited, members of the public can still provide information and argument to Council by either speaking at the public hearing or providing information in advance to be included in the materials that staff prepares for Council as part of the public hearing record. If you wish to speak at a public hearing on a quasi-judicial matter before the City Council or provide information prior to the Council's public hearing, please contact the City Clerk's Office for further information. 

Rules for Appeal Hearing Participation

Only eligible participants can speak during an appeal (see p. 4 of the Appeal Guidelines above for eligibility). Within 14 calendar days after the Notice of Appeal is posted on this page, any eligible person who would like to participate must submit an Appeal Party Registration Form. Within two business days of receiving the form, the City Clerk will review it and confirm whether the person is eligible to participate. 


Appeals

For access to these documents, please submit a CORA request: Public Records Request

Appeal Documents  Subject of Appeal Appeal Hearing Date Appellant(s) Original Decision-Maker
  Sonders Village PDP 230012 and ODP (Withdrawn) N/A

 

Jason Holland  Planning and Zoning Commission
  Longstein Single Unit Dwelling with ADU (Withdrawn) N/A  Kirk Longstein Historic Preservation Commission
  201 Linden Hotel November 19, 2024 David Diehl Historic Preservation Commission
  Fort Collins Rescue Mission November 6, 2024 Appellant #1: Troy Jones
Appellant #2: Rebeca Mendoza 
Planning & Zoning Commission
  Sanctuary on the Green PDP 2100018 October 15, 2024 Andrew Pipes Marcus McAskin
  College and Trilby PDP 220009 October 1, 2024 Appellant #1: Marcus Mims
Appellant #2: Libby Abramovich
Lori B. Strand
  2601 South College Avenue June 4, 2024 Angela Hygh Historic Preservation Commission
  Mason Street Infrastructure - ODP Approval May 7, 2024 Charles Meserlian Planning and Zoning Commission
  Union Park PDP230005 Street Stub Requirement April 16, 2024 Jeff Janelle Planning and Zoning Commission
  Polestar Development February 6, 2024 Charles Thompson Planning and Zoning Commission
  Ziegler/Corbett Overall Development Plan August 15, 2023 Appellant #1: Craig Latzke
Appellant #2: Lacey Joyal
Planning and Zoning Commission
  1901 and 1925 Hull Street - Historic Landmark Non-Eligibility February 21, 2023 James Sack Historic Preservation Commission
  636 Castle Ridge Group Home March 7, 2023 Two Individual Appeals Filed by: (1) Steve Sunderman (2) Kurt Johnson, et al., Planning and Zoning Commission
  825 North College Avenue - Landmark Eligibility December 20, 2022 Timothy Goddard for GARA, LLC Historic Preservation Commission
  1306 West Mountain Avenue - Final Design Review October 4, 2022 Jeffrey Schneider; Brian and Barbara Berkausen Historic Preservation Commission
  1802 North College Avenue - Finding of Eligibility as a Landmark September 20, 2022 Jeffrey Cullers, Attorney for Appellant H and H Properties, LLC Historic Preservation Commission
  Sanctuary on the Green August 16, 2022   Laura Larson Marcus McKaskin
  Sam's Club Fuel Station - Denial of Major Amendment and Additional Permitted Use January 18, 2022 Carolynne White Planning and Zoning Commission
  Mountain Ridge Farm (1103 Wabash Street) - Excess Water Use Fee October 5, 2021 Brian Ball, Kathy Louderback Lance Smith, Director
  Guardian Self Storage  

June 1, 2021

Jon Bradley, Attorney for OSF Investments Planning and Zoning Board
  738 Campfire Drive Extra Occupancy Project Development Plan March 16, 2021 Joseph Brown Administrative Hearing Officer
  724 and 726 South College - Denial of Landmark Eligibility December 1, 2020 Nicole R. Ament, Esq. Landmark Preservation Commission